Tuesday 20 November 2012

Why animal rights activists will fail


Over the last couple of weeks, there has been much renewed talk about the banning of live exports after a horrific story coming out of Pakistan revealed that 20,000 sheep where needlessly slaughtered in a cruel and horrific manner. I am yet to find one person who thinks what happened in Pakistan is acceptable, but I can find many people who think we should not stop exporting there.

Many of the anthropomorphists who oppose the trade will state that even 1 breach of the ESCAS standards is reason enough to turn our back on the trade and walk away. Yet these same people are not calling for a total ban on all surgeons after the tragedy that occurred at Bundaberg hospital, or a ban on all motor coach transport as a result of the Kempsey bush crash. Why? Because these people will set the standards so high that there is no way any person, including themselves, can achieve it.

Which brings us to the Achilles heel of the anthropomorphist movement, they are never happy with what they get.

Only last week, we saw Animals Australia launch another campaign against the horse racing industry. In the middle of the spring racing season, in the wash up from the Melbourne cup, which has become a national institution, they have come out against horseracing. They are like the divorced, bitter middle aged uncle you only see at family gatherings that when asked how he is will answer, “I’m not well” and will then spend the rest of the evening telling you what is wrong with him and complaining about what every other person in the room has done to him, right down to when your dad stole his iceblock from him when he was 3. Eventually you get to the point that when you see him enter the room, you feign a bout of bubonic plague, just so you can leave the room.

Don’t get me wrong, I in no way condone animal cruelty and I enjoy the company of my animals, but I don’t want to spend an evening being lectured on how dairy farming is rape and to eat an egg is to eat the period of a chook. It is emotive, sensationalist and often factually inaccurate.

Only the other day, I read an article on “The truth about  sheep” on the animals Australia unleashed page http://www.unleashed.org.au/animals/sheep.php to read this, you would think that all sheep farmers where cruel heartless bastards who mustered their sheep once a year to shear them and left them to their own devices. Like most of the bile and vitriol spewed forth by the animal rights groups, there is a little bit of fact, interspersed with a lot of sensationalism, sprinkled with some emotive statements and misrepresentations. Yes, shearers are paid by the head and want to shear them as quick as possible, no that does not mean they are roughly shorn. From an economic standpoint alone, the wool must be evenly and cleanly shorn to receive full value for the clip and a sheep that is cut about at shearing time takes a while to recover, and like any animal, if it is happy, it is productive. As a woolgrower, I can tell you that any shearer who races and knocks the sheep about gets told quick smart to slow down and do the job properly. Rough shearers don’t last long in the industry, they soon improve their skills or find themselves not asked back next year.

I have also noticed that PETA has now come out to allege animal cruelty on the set of “The Hobbit” http://www.smh.com.au/entertainment/movies/jackson-denies-animal-mistreatment-on-hobbit-set-20121120-29n8o.html It seems the Peta radicals are calling for people to boycott the film when it opens in cinemas. Good Luck with that, I think the call for those obsessed with high fantasy boycotting the movie will have as much chance as a cream bun in a room of fat kids. It’s not gunna happen.

So this brings me back to my initial point, the Animal Welfare lobby looks like a worthwhile cause at first glance when they are calling for someone who drowns kittens to be held accountable, but as they go on, they develop more and more outrageous demands  that affect the daily life of more and more people. They continually demand more, start a new campaign, piss a few more people off. Yes they will have a win occasionally, but as they continue their campaigns, they will impact on more and more average Australians in a negative way. Eventually, there will be no-one left to support them, with the possible exception of an unwashed Lezzo with dreadlocks, wearing hemp knickers that smells of pot smoke.

Should we be worried about groups like PETA and Animals Australia? Absolutely. Will they ultimately succeed? Not a chance.